Myles & DeLana Rutherford
Worship With Wonders Church
Marietta, Georgia
Independent Charismatic
Mandated Reporter Failure, Cover-Up of Child Sexual Abuse
Legislative Action Pending (SB 542)
Legislative Records, News Reports
When allegations of child sexual abuse surfaced at Worship With Wonders Church in Marietta, Georgia, pastors Myles and DeLana Rutherford faced a critical decision: report the abuse to authorities as mandated by law, or handle it internally. According to legislative testimony and investigative reports, they chose the latter—a decision that would spark outrage and legislative action across the state.
The case involves allegations that the pastoral couple became aware of child sexual abuse occurring within their congregation but failed to report it to law enforcement or child protective services, as required under Georgia's mandated reporter laws. Instead, sources indicate the matter was addressed through internal church processes, allowing the alleged abuse to continue and potentially putting additional children at risk.
The failure to report represents not just a violation of legal obligations but a fundamental breach of the duty of care that religious leaders owe to the most vulnerable members of their community. Georgia law is clear: clergy members are mandated reporters who must immediately report suspected child abuse to authorities. The Rutherfords' alleged decision to circumvent this requirement has become a flashpoint in the ongoing debate about clergy accountability and institutional protection of abusers.
Worship With Wonders Church, an independent charismatic congregation, has maintained a low public profile since the allegations emerged. The church has not issued comprehensive public statements addressing the specific allegations or explaining why mandated reporting protocols were allegedly not followed.
Sources familiar with the situation indicate that the church's leadership initially framed the matter as an internal disciplinary issue rather than a criminal matter requiring law enforcement involvement. This approach—treating child sexual abuse as a spiritual problem to be resolved through prayer, counseling, or church discipline rather than as a crime—reflects a dangerous pattern seen across multiple denominations and church structures.
The lack of transparency and accountability in the church's response has fueled calls for stronger enforcement mechanisms and criminal penalties for clergy who fail to fulfill their mandated reporter obligations. Community members and child safety advocates have expressed frustration that institutional self-protection appears to have taken precedence over child protection.
The Theological Problem: Many independent charismatic churches operate under a doctrine of "spiritual covering" and "apostolic authority" that places pastors in positions of nearly absolute power. When abuse occurs, this theological framework can create a dangerous belief that spiritual leaders have the authority—and even the responsibility—to handle all matters internally, including criminal conduct.
This doctrine directly conflicts with biblical commands to protect the vulnerable and submit to governing authorities. Romans 13 clearly establishes that civil government has God-given authority to punish wrongdoing. When church leaders bypass law enforcement to handle criminal abuse internally, they're not exercising spiritual authority—they're obstructing justice.
The Compass Drift: The doctrine of spiritual covering, when taken to extremes, becomes a shield for abusers rather than a framework for accountability. What began as a biblical principle of pastoral care drifted into an authoritarian structure that prioritizes institutional reputation over child safety. This case illustrates how even one degree of doctrinal drift—from "pastors provide spiritual guidance" to "pastors have absolute authority over all matters"—can lead to catastrophic moral failure.
The Rutherford case became a catalyst for legislative action in Georgia. State Senator Jason Esteves introduced Senate Bill 542, which would establish criminal penalties for mandated reporters—including clergy—who fail to report suspected child abuse. The bill represents a significant strengthening of Georgia's child protection laws and sends a clear message that institutional protection of abusers will no longer be tolerated.
Under the proposed legislation, clergy members who knowingly fail to report child abuse could face criminal charges, including potential jail time and fines. The bill eliminates ambiguity about clergy obligations and closes loopholes that have allowed some religious leaders to claim they were unaware of their reporting duties or believed they had discretion in whether to report.
Supporters of SB 542 argue that criminal penalties are necessary because existing civil penalties and professional consequences have proven insufficient to ensure compliance with mandated reporting laws. The bill has garnered bipartisan support from lawmakers who recognize that child safety must take precedence over institutional concerns about reputation or autonomy.
Religious liberty advocates have raised concerns about the bill, arguing it could infringe on pastoral confidentiality and the sanctity of confession. However, proponents counter that mandated reporting laws already apply to clergy in most contexts, and that protecting children from ongoing abuse outweighs concerns about confidentiality. The bill includes provisions to protect legitimate pastoral counseling while ensuring that knowledge of child abuse triggers immediate reporting obligations.
The Rutherford case is far from isolated. Our investigation has documented 78 cases of clergy abuse and institutional failure across the United States, and mandated reporter failures appear in a disturbing number of them. The pattern reveals several common factors:
Independent charismatic churches, which operate without denominational oversight or accountability structures, are particularly vulnerable to these failures. Without external accountability, pastoral authority can become absolute, and there are no institutional mechanisms to ensure compliance with legal and ethical obligations.
The Rutherford case demonstrates why legislative action is necessary. Voluntary compliance and internal church reforms have proven insufficient. Criminal penalties for mandated reporter failures create a clear deterrent and send a message that child safety is non-negotiable, regardless of religious affiliation or theological beliefs.
If you have additional information about mandated reporter failures or institutional cover-ups, we want to hear from you. Your voice matters in holding institutions accountable.
Article 10 of 29
If you have information about misconduct or abuse in a church or ministry, our secure tip line protects your identity.
Submit a Tip